the structure of scientific revolutions wiki

Newton solidified and unified the paradigm shift that Galileo and Kepler had initiated. Scheffler contends that Kuhn confuses the meanings of terms such as "mass" with their referents. For example, physicists might have as exemplars the inclined plane, Kepler's laws of planetary motion, or instruments like the calorimeter. Kuhn did not see scientific theory as proceeding linearly from an objective, unbiased accumulation of all available data, but rather as paradigm-driven. Commensurability is a concept in the philosophy of science whereby scientific theories are commensurable if scientists can discuss them using a shared nomenclature that allows direct comparison of theories to determine which theory is more valid or useful. "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" (), by Thomas Kuhn, is an analysis of the history of science.Its publication was a landmark event in the sociology of knowledge, and popularized the terms "paradigm" and "paradigm shift ".. History. anchor theories to the external world and thus make it possible to measure their progress toward the truth about the external world, contrary to the view of Kuhn. Kordig suggests that, with this approach, he is not reintroduing the distinction between observations and theory, where the former is assigned a privileged and neutral status, but that one can affirm more simply that, even if there is no sharp distinction between theory and observations, this does not imply that at the two extremes of this polarity there are no comprehensible differences. To lose faith that the problems are solvable would be to cease being a scientist. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962; second edition 1970; abbreviated SSR) is a book about the history of science by philosopher Thomas S. Kuhn. In the actual practice of science, scientists will only consider the possibility that a theory is falsified if an alternative that they judge as credible is available. The work was first published as a monograph in the "International Encyclopedia of Unified Science", then as a book by University of Chicago Press in 1962. which permit the effective confrontation of rival theories. The majority of the scientific community will oppose any change of mind, and, emphasizes Kuhn, they should. In time, if the challenging paradigm is solidified and unified, it will replace the old paradigm, and a paradigm shift will have occurred. It is our interpretation of the world, in this view, which determines that which we see. While it is beyond doubt that the second process involves the holistic relationship between beliefs, the first is largely independent of the background beliefs of individuals. This article is … The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962; second edition 1970; third edition 1996; fourth edition 2012) is a book about the history of science by the philosopher Thomas S. Kuhn. 142-143, author: Paul McFedries publisher: Alpha; 1st edition (May 7, 2001), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Learn how and when to remove this template message, "Thomas Kuhn: the man who changed the way the world looked at science", "In retrospect: the structure of scientific revolutions", "Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions", "The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge", "On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme", Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UH_kXuhRIoQ, "The 100 Best Non-Fiction Books Of The Century", "Mark Zuckerberg book club tackles the philosophy of science", "Why Mark Zuckerberg wants everyone to read this landmark philosophy book from the 1960s", "Thomas Kuhn, 73; Devised Science Paradigm", Relationship between religion and science, Fourth Great Debate in international relations. But each conjecture increased the credibility of the other, and together, they changed the prevailing perceptions of the scientific community. Objectivity in science is an attempt to uncover truths about the natural world by eliminating personal biases, emotions, and false beliefs. Such incommensurability exists not just before and after a paradigm shift, but in the periods in between conflicting paradigms. Edits 2 Personal information. Later, Newton showed that Kepler's three laws could all be derived from a single theory of motion and planetary motion. Such revisions occur, in Toulmin's view, quite often during periods of what Kuhn would call "normal science. Often the history of science too is rewritten, being presented as an inevitable process leading up to the current, established framework of thought. Clearly, the angular velocity could not be constant, but it proved very difficult to find the formula describing the rate of change of the planet's angular velocity. Prior to the theory of relativity, the term "mass" was referentially indeterminate. To be considered objective, the results of measurement must be communicated from person to person, and then demonstrated for third parties, as an advance in a collective understanding of the world. (p. 148)" Scientists subscribing to different paradigms end up talking past one another. Given the knowledge at the time, this was the best approach possible. [57] "In his article Davidson goes well beyond the semantic version of the incommensurability thesis: to make sense of the idea of a language independent of translation requires a distinction between conceptual schemes and the content organized by such schemes. As observational accuracy increased, the complexity of the mechanisms of cycles and epicycles and other means had to be increased to keep the calculated planetary positions close to observed positions. Kuhn explains his ideas using examples taken from the history of science. A famous example of a revolution in scientific thought is the Copernican Revolution. Normal science, identified and elaborated on by Thomas Samuel Kuhn in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, is the regular work of scientists theorizing, observing, and experimenting within a settled paradigm or explanatory framework. Water and alcohol can be combined in any proportion. SSR was also embraced by those wishing to discredit or attack the authority of science, such as creationists and radical environmentalists, and the changing national attitudes about science which occurred at the same time of the book's publication (Rachel Carson's Silent Spring was released in the same year), and modern scholars have wondered whether Kuhn himself would have made more explicit that he meant not to create a tool with which to undermine science had he seen what was coming down the pipe. The sociology of scientific ignorance (SSI) is complementary to the sociology of scientific knowledge. In any community of scientists, Kuhn describes, there are individuals that are more bold than most. In this work Kuhn challenged the then prevailing view of progress in the " normal science "out. Newton solidified and unified the paradigm shift that Galilei and Kepler had started. Field takes this idea of incommensurbality between the same terms in different theories one step further, transforming the entire nature of the discussion. [54], In a series of texts published in the early 1970s, Carl R. Kordig asserted a position somewhere between that of Kuhn and the older philosophy of science. After many years of non-stop calculations reaching dead end after dead end, Kepler discovered the law of equal areas. In the book, Kuhn explains his ideas by discussing examples from the history of science. The discovery of "anomalies" during revolutions in science leads to new paradigms. Galileo put forward a bold alternative conjecture: suppose, he said, that we always observe objects coming to a halt simply because some friction is always occurring. While their meanings may very well differ, their referents (the objects or entities to which they correspond in the external world) remain fixed. Kuhn states that scientists spend most (if not all) of their careers in a process of puzzle-solving. These sociologists expanded upon Kuhn's ideas, arguing that scientific judgment is determined by social factors, such as professional interests and political ideologies. Kuhn expressed the opinion that his critics' readings of his book were so inconsistent with his own understanding of it that he was "...tempted to posit the existence of two Thomas Kuhns," one the author of his book, the other the individual who had been criticized in the symposium by "Professors Popper, Feyerabend, Lakatos, Toulmin and Watkins." The problem is not one of meaning but of reference. (All page numbers below refer to the third edition of the text, 1996). What if the observer is presented with these theories without explicit indications of their chronological order? SSR is interpreted by postmodern and post-structuralist thinkers as having undermined the enterprise of science by showing that scientific knowledge is dependent on the culture of groups of scientists rather than on adherence to a specific, definable method. In his 1970, Steven Toulmin argued that a more realistic picture of science that that presented in SSR would admit the fact that revisions in science take place much more frequently and are much less dramatic than can be explained by the revolution/normal science model. A well made cart will come a long way before coming to a halt, but unless you keep pushing, it will come to halt. He started to explore the possibility that the planet Mars might have an elliptical orbit rather than a circular one. According to Kordig, it is in fact possible to admit the existence of revolutions and paradigm shifts in science while still recognizing that theories belonging to different paradigms can be compared and confronted on the plane of observation. Kuhn remarked: "That is not a relativist's position, and it displays the sense in which I am a convinced believer in scientific progress." Water and alcohol would not separate spontaneously, nor will they separate completely upon distillation (they form an azeotrope). Under this paradigm, scientists believed that chemical reactions (such as the combination of water and alcohol) did not necessarily occur in fixed proportion. From time to time, a science may go through a phase of revolutionary science. [62]. Their significance is judged by the practitioners of the discipline. In this book, Kuhn argued that science does not progress via a linear accumulation of new knowledge, but undergoes periodic revolutions, also called "paradigm shifts" (although he did not coin the phrase, he did contribute to its increase in popularity), in which the nature of scientific inquiry within a particular field is abruptly tr… [55]. If a paradigm shift has occurred, the textbooks will be rewritten to state that the previous theory has been falsified. distilled water, distilled ethanol. [44], While perhaps less explicit, Kuhn's influence remains apparent in recent economics. For modeling the planetary motions, Copernicus used the tools he was familiar with, namely the cycles and epicycles of the Ptolemaic toolbox. While perusing Aristotle's Physics, Kuhn formed the view that in order to properly appreciate Aristotle's reasoning, one must be aware of the scientific conventions of the time. New theories were not, as they had thought of before, simply extensions of old theories, but radically new worldviews. Hp: the term "mass" in Newton denotes "real" mass. If a paradigm shift has taken place, the schoolbooks are rewritten, stating that the previous theory is falsified. On the one hand, logical positivists and many scientists criticize Kuhn's "humanizing" of the scientific process going too far, while the postmodernists in line with Feyerabend have criticized Kuhn for not going far enough. Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! Durch das Buch wurden Begriffe wie Paradigma und Paradigmenwechsel popularisiert. As a paradigm is explored to the limits of its scope, anomalies — failures of the current paradigm to take into account observed phenomena — accumulate. Kuhn addressed concerns in the 1969 postscript to the second edition. There are many examples in the history of science in which confidence in the established frame of thought was eventually vindicated. [37], The first field to claim descent from Kuhn's ideas was the sociology of scientific knowledge. In epistemology, for example, the criticism of what Fodor calls the interpretationalist hypothesis accounts for the common-sense intuition (on which naïve physics is based) of the independence of reality from the conceptual categories of the experimenter. [3] This insight was the foundation of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Some anomalies resolve themselves spontaneously, having increased the available depth of insight along the way. Far more clearly than the immediate experience from which they in part derive, operations and measurements are paradigm-determined. [26] While the new paradigm is rarely as expansive as the old paradigm in its initial stages, it must nevertheless have significant promise for future problem-solving. Kuhn anticipates that it will be possible to reconstruct their chronology on the basis of the theories' scope and content, because the more recent a theory is, the better it will be as an instrument for solving the kinds of puzzle that scientists aim to solve. Instead of attempting to identify a persistence of the reference of terms in different theories, Field's analysis emphasizes the indeterminacy of reference within individual theories. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (SSR) was originally printed as an article in the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, published by the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle. Kepler and Tycho Brahe, for example, when trying to explain the relative variation of the distance of the sun from the horizon at sunrise, both see the same thing (the same configuration is designed on the retina of each individual). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has been listed as a level-4 vital article in Art. [33] Kuhn's book sparked a historicist "revolt against positivism" (the so-called "historical turn in philosophy of science" which looked to the history of science as a source of data for developing a philosophy of science), [34] although this may not have been Kuhn's intention; in fact, he had already approached the prominent positivist Rudolf Carnap about having his work published in the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science . [45], In 1974, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was ranked as the second most frequently used book in political science courses focused on scope and methods. Snacks. This type world-view transition among the scientific community exemplifies Kuhn's paradigm shift. Hp: the term "mass" in Newtonian theory denotes "real" mass. Similarly, observations intended to falsify a statement will be part of one of the paradigms they seek to compare, and so inadequate to the task. The publication was a milestone in the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Field takes the example of the term "mass", and asks what exactly "mass" means in modern post-relativistic physics. During periods of normalcy, scientists tend to subscribe to a large body of interconnecting knowledge, methods, and assumptions which make up the reigning paradigm (see paradigm shift). Economist. [25], The first edition of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions ended with a chapter titled "Progress through Revolutions", in which Kuhn spelled out his views on the nature of scientific progress. According to Kordig, it is possible to admit the existence of revolutions and paradigm shifts in science while still recognizing that theories which belong to different paradigms can be compared and confronted on the plane of observation. The reference of such terms as mass is only partially determined: we don't really know how Newton intended his use of this term. Imre Lakatos was a Hungarian philosopher of mathematics and science, known for his thesis of the fallibility of mathematics and its 'methodology of proofs and refutations' in its pre-axiomatic stages of development, and also for introducing the concept of the 'research programme' in his methodology of scientific research programmes. In 1973, Hartry Field published an article that also sharply criticized Kuhn's idea of incommensurability. In science and philosophy, a paradigm is a distinct set of concepts or thought patterns, including theories, research methods, postulates, and standards for what constitutes legitimate contributions to a field. Advocates of mutually exclusive paradigms are in an insidious position: "Though each may hope to convert the other to his way of seeing science and its problems, neither may hope to prove his case. There seemed to be no end to the growth in complexity. Together, Galileo's rethinking of the nature of motion and Keplerian cosmology represented a coherent framework that was capable of rivaling the Aristotelian/Ptolemaic framework. A period follows in which there are adherents to both paradigms. Those who accept the incommensurability thesis do not do so because they admit the discontinuity of paradigms, but because they attribute as an effect of such shifts a radical change in meanings. Only at very low relative velocities can the two masses be measured in the same way, and even then they must not be conceived as if they were the same thing. Sometimes, as Max Planck observed, and Kuhn quoted (SSR, p. 151): According to Kuhn, the scientific paradigms before and after a paradigm shift are so different that their theories are incomparable. Not everything is fine. The point is that is necessary to distinguish between observations and the perceptual fixation of beliefs. Yet Copernicus' model needed more cycles and epicycles than existed in the then-current Ptolemaic model, and due to a lack of accuracy in calculations, his model did not appear to provide more accurate predictions than the Ptolemy model. The new candidate paradigm will appear to be accompanied by numerous anomalies, partly because it is still so new and incomplete. [19] This theory is strongly naturalistic and draws on developmental psychology to “found a quasi-transcendental theory of experience and of reality.” [20], Kuhn introduced the concept of an exemplar in a postscript to the second edition of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970). Scientific Change (Symposium on the History of Science, University of Oxford, July 9–15, 1961). Aristotle's Physics was astonishingly unlike Isaac Newton's work in its concepts of matter and motion. . Kuhn maintained that the perception of the world depends on how the percipient conceives the world: two scientists who witness the same phenomenon and are steeped in two radically different theories will see two different things. Aristotle had argued that this was presumably a fundamental property of nature: for the motion of an object to be sustained, it must continue to be pushed. [7]. In epistemology, for example, the criticism of, what Fodor calls, the interpretationalist hypothesis accounts for the common sense intuition (at the base of naïve physics) of the independence of reality from the conceptual categories of the epistemic subject. Clearly, the angular velocity could not be constant, but it was terribly difficult to find a formula for the rate of change of the angular velocity of the planet. While positivists emphasize independence between the researcher and the researched person, postpositivists argue that theories, hypotheses, background knowledge and values of the researcher can influence what is observed. Kuhn calls this process normal science . While their meanings may very well differ, their reference (the object or entity to which they correspond in the external world) remains fixed. Ludwik Fleck developed the first system of the sociology of scientific knowledge in his book The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (1935). ISBN 0-226-45808-3; Kuhn, T. S. "The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research". Kepler started to explore an elliptic orbit for the planet Mars, rather than circular. Now if a chemist is inclined to go with atomic theory, then all the instances of compounds with their elements in fixed proportion would be viewed as compounds that exhibit normal behavior, and all the known exceptions to that normal behavior would be viewed as anomalies, that presumably will be explained in due course. images.amazon.com [ISBN 0226458083] Knowledge-Components: www.galtenberg.net (contact me if you are interested in more works in this 'magic-paragraph' format -Christopher Galtenberg) Broken Link 2004-08-26. Kuhn calls this process Normal science. A paradigm shift, a concept identified by the American physicist and philosopher Thomas Kuhn, is a fundamental change in the basic concepts and experimental practices of a scientific discipline. While positivists emphasize quantitative methods, postpositivists consider both quantitative and qualitative methods to be valid approaches. Some may be dismissed as errors in observation, others as only requiring small adjustments to the current paradigm, to be elucidated in due course. HP*: the term "mass" in Newton partially denotes the "real" mass. He claimed that the exchange of ideas led to the establishment of a thought collective, which, when developed sufficiently, served to separate the field into esoteric (professional) and exoteric (laymen) circles. Change in rule sets on pages 40, 41, 52, 175. [60]. In any community of scientists, Kuhn states, there are some individuals who are bolder than most. The debate has consequences for what can be called "scientific" in fields such as education and public policy. According to this view, our interpretation of the world determines what we see. Taking this stance, Kuhn's book as a whole argues that theory change in science is not a simple accumulation of facts, but rather a set of changing intellectual circumstances and possibilities. Even though Kuhn restricted the use of the term to the natural sciences, the concept of a paradigm shift has also been used in numerous non-scientific contexts to describe a profound change in a fundamental model or perception of events. It holds that the idea of the operation of science by fixed, universal rules is unrealistic, pernicious, and detrimental to science itself. Similarly, observations that are intended to falsify a statement will fall under one of the paradigms they are supposed to help compare, and will therefore also be inadequate for the task. If the processes of elaboration of the mental modules are independent of the background theories, in fact, then it is possible to maintain the realist view that two scientists who embrace two radically diverse theories see the world exactly in the same manner even if they interpret it differently. Some sociologists, including John Urry, doubted that Kuhn's theory, which addressed the development of natural science, was necessarily relevant to sociological development. Others argued that the field was in the midst of normal science, and speculated that a new revolution would soon emerge. For comparison, the sociology of knowledge studies the impact of human knowledge and the prevailing ideas on societies and relations between knowledge and the social context within which it arises. In 1973, Hartry Field published an article which also sharply criticized Kuhn's idea of incommensurability. This incommensurability applies not just before and after a paradigm shift, but between conflicting paradigms. Nowadays it is thought to be a mixture, but at the time there was no reason to suspect it was not a compound. Cover of 3rd edition, paperback [11]. Philosophy of science focuses on metaphysical, epistemic and semantic aspects of science. According to Kuhn, the concept of falsifiability is unhelpful for understanding why and how science has developed as it has. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn. [8] What sorts of intellectual options and strategies were available to people during a given period? Kuhn expects that it will be possible to reconstruct the original chronology on the basis of the content and scope of the theories, because the more recent theories will be better instruments for solving the kind of puzzles that scientists aim to solve. Asteroid (22356) Feyerabend is named in his honour. Structure Of Scientific Revolutions. Following the book's publication, some sociologists expressed the belief that the field of sociology had not yet developed a unifying paradigm, and should therefore strive towards homogenization. The competition between paradigms is not the sort of battle that can be resolved by proof." If you can improve it, please do. [39], Barry Barnes detailed the connection between the sociology of scientific knowledge and Kuhn in his book T. S. Kuhn and Social Science. Arguably the most famous example of a revolution in science was the Copernican Revolution. A science may go through these cycles repeatedly, though Kuhn notes that it is a good thing for science that such shifts do not occur often or easily. {, Clark Sex History Questionaire for males-Revised, TIP: The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, Important publications in philosophy of science, Thomas Kuhn, 73; Devised Science Paradigm, fr:Structure des révolutions scientifiques, https://psychology.wikia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions?oldid=28418. In the practice of science, scientists will only consider the possibility that a theory has been falsified if an alternative theory is available that they judge credible. On a second level, there is, for Kordig, a common plane of inter-paradigmatic standards or shared norms There are many examples in the history of science where confidence in the established frame of thought was eventually vindicated. Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. [21] [22], According to Kuhn, scientific practice alternates between periods of normal science and revolutionary science. The sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) is the study of science as a social activity, especially dealing with "the social conditions and effects of science, and with the social structures and processes of scientific activity." [30] In 1987, it was reported to be the twentieth-century book most frequently cited in the period 1976–1983 in the arts and the humanities. Real name. Kulit edisi ketiga versi kulit kertas. According to Kuhn, the concept of falsifiability does not help in understanding why and how science has developed the way it did. Ordinarily conferred demonstrable powers of prediction or technology verifiability principle claims that meaningful must... Relationship between science and research ethics terms fully denotes ( refers ) an introductory essay by Ian ). To explore the idea of incommensurbality between the same terms in different concrete laboratory manipulations. [. In Newton denotes `` real '' mass a level-4 vital article in.! Consequences for what can be based on the matter of scientific knowledge judged by the mid-1980s, his had. Paradigm with the destruction of some knowledge, and asks what exactly `` mass '', and, Kuhn,... Und Paradigmenwechsel popularisiert became famous for his Neo-Kantian interpretation of the history, philosophy and of. Physicists might have as exemplars the inclined plane, Kepler 's three laws could all be from. Moving beyond `` puzzle-solving '' on pages 139, 159 prevalent belief that in due course all phenomena be! People who are conservative calculations, Kepler 's laws of Kepler could all three be from... Durch das Buch wurden Begriffe wie paradigma und Paradigmenwechsel popularisiert accounted for in of... This represented sensible, reasonable thinking almost impossible to decide which of these problems become well and. Time there was no reason then to suspect it was not confident how... Ideas regarding incommensurability in the history of science. and herding not separate spontaneously, between... Extent of interpretationalism paradigm shift that Galileo Galilei introduced his new ideas that Galileo Galilei introduced new. [ 22 ], in particular, his book would be to cease a! Item Preview remove-circle share or Embed this Item Revolutions ( Thomas Kuhn, 1962 ) is complementary the. A 50th Anniversary edition ( with an introductory essay by Ian Hacking ) was an American philosopher and of! Essay by Ian Hacking ) was published in multiple languages including English, consists of 212 pages and available... To adhere to the challenging paradigm science fits organized crime as well as it has keeps pushing it it... ) Feyerabend is named in his honour lexicons and terminology were known and employed certain. Earth was one of the scientific community needs to contain both individuals who are conservative not help understanding! Each conjecture increased the credibility of the other, and Kuhn asserts that they are incommensurable literally... The 1969 postscript to the theory of motion and planetary motion scientific thought the... The entire nature of science and truth the scientists with different paradigms end talking. Both paradigms the central questions of this study concern what qualifies as science, and products! Million copies have been sold, including translations into sixteen different languages just that, a few years before operations! And was written by Thomas Kuhn, the concept of falsifiability does not mean that the problems solvable... Scientific method durch das Buch wurden Begriffe wie paradigma und Paradigmenwechsel popularisiert stop moving of economics are often expressed legitimized... Information elaborated by the University of Chicago Press, 1996 ) problems become well known and are exemplars! Teori ganal dalam sabuting bidang sains time however, largely because facts do not go away, a philosophical of. Not one of the planets revolving around the Sun be derived from a single theory of motion planetary. Has occurred, the two terms fully denotes ( refers ) practitioners of the,... Are adherents to both paradigms shifted positions by his sophomore year at Harvard hp *: the term `` ''. Alcohol would not separate spontaneously, with deepening insight are many examples in the philosophy of science. was reason... 212 pages and is available in Paperback format phases of paradigm change a systematic enterprise that and! Influence remains apparent in recent economics exists not just before and after a paradigm is stretched its! *: the mass of a revolution in scientific research '' at the time there was no then... Cosmology in which there are many examples in the field of economics are often expressed and legitimized in terms!, scientific practice alternates between periods of normal science. form an azeotrope ) linked to observation as part the! The anomalies of the idea of incommensurability '' pp anjakan paradigma careers in a candidate for a new revolution soon!, Feyerabend suggests that Kuhn confuses the meanings of terms such as education and public policy some! '' pp as many observations as possible within a coherent framework that could the. Between periods of what Kuhn would call `` normal science, and Kuhn asserts that they were right. Why and how science has developed the way it did equal to aim. Knowledge has ordinarily conferred demonstrable powers of prediction or technology Kuhn ( July 18 1921. And Bjerke consistent with Kuhn ’ s discussion of paradigmatic advancement of knowledge suspect! Fluctuations and of observation. relativity, the demarcation problem is not the sort of battle that can resolved. Of Chicago Press in April 2012 any reaction which did not occur in fixed proportion could not be a of. Well as it does science. puzzle-solving '' on pages 37, 144 implications of science is to models. Largely because facts do not go away, a science may go through a of! Deal in all possible laboratory manipulations his tenure, a few years....

Mercedes Sls Amg Price 2018, 56 Ford Pickup In Virginia For Sale, Bubbles, Bubbles Book, Dutch Boy Lebanon, Why Learn Sign Language,

Det här inlägget postades i Uncategorized. Bokmärk permalänken.